course_outline
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
course_outline [2012/01/09 01:45] – jonathan | course_outline [2012/04/04 14:23] (current) – jonathan | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
**Thursday**: | **Thursday**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Required reading**: How to write requirements (see SVN) | ||
===== Week 2 January 9===== | ===== Week 2 January 9===== | ||
- | Discuss Assignment 1. Complete Requirements/ | + | **Tuesday**: |
+ | |||
+ | **Thursday**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Required reading**: //A rational design process: How and why to fake it//, Parnas and Clements [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Week 3 January 16===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Discussion of Assignment 1 - right margin justification. Discussed ambiguities and incompleteness in the specification. R-descriptions versus E-descriptions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ROI RD: Start at section 3, Dictionary. Mathematical Model for ROI. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Required Reading**: //Four Dark Corners of Requirements Engineering//, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Rest of the syllabus===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Function tables (Parnas tables). Dell keyboard. Completeness, | ||
+ | * Unit testing tools for Java, C# and other languages. The V-diagram, Validation and Verification. | ||
+ | * Parnas on documentation and Jackson on Sofwtare Engineering. | ||
+ | * Structure of a requirements document. Context diagram. Atomic E and R-descriptions. Mathematical model. Links between atomic descriptions and Mathematical model. Acceptance tests. Tracability matrix. Developing acceptance tests from function tables as well as atomic descriptions. | ||
+ | * Requirements for safety critical systems. Fairness. Temporal logic. Modelchecking. |
course_outline.1326073523.txt.gz · Last modified: 2012/01/09 01:45 by jonathan