{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Sheet1"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":0,"defined_names":0,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Sheet1","index":0,"n_rows":7,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":7,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["Rubric for final project evaluation"]
[null,"D","C","B","A"]
["Requirements Document (15%) - 16, 19, 20","The document talks about the system, not the customer. Many features are missing. No acceptance test cases. Poor English / presentation. (2)","The document mixes customer needs with system description. Several features are missing. No acceptance test cases. Fair presentation. (5)","The document describes the needs of the customer. Some detail about the features is missing. Insufficient acceptance test cases. Good presentation. (10)","The document describes the needs of the customer. All required features are described in detail. Acceptance test cases are provided. Professional presentation. (15)"]
["Design Document (20%) - 16, 19, 20","Key system components are missing. Class and sequence diagrams are not provided. Maintenance scenarios are not discussed. Poor presentation. (3)","Several system components are discussed in detail. Class and sequence diagrams are not provided. Maintenance scenarios are not discussed. Fair presentation. (8)","The document describes the high level organization of the system as well as individual components. Class and sequence diagrams are provided, but are not very informative. Maintenance scenarios are not discussed. Good presentation. (14)","The document describes the high level organization of the system as well as individual components. Informative class and sequence diagrams are provided. Maintenance scenarios are discussed. Professional presentation.(20)"]
["Testing Document (15%) - 16, 17, 20","The document describes the test cases run. Discussion on why this should be sufficient testing is missing. Testing coverage metrics are not provided. Poor presentation. (2)","The document describes the test cases run,  and the way they were implemented. Discussion on why this should be sufficient testing is missing. Testing coverage metrics are provided only at a course level. Fair presentation.(5)","The document describes the test cases run, the way they were derived, and the way they were implemented. Discussion on why this should be sufficient testing is missing. Testing coverage metrics are provided. Good presentation.(10)","The document describes the test cases run, the way they were derived, and the way they were implemented. Discussion on why this should be sufficient testing is included. Testing coverage metrics are provided. Professional presentation.(15)"]
["User Manual (10%) - 16, 20","The document is just a list of examples of running the system. Screendumps are not provided. Poor presentation.(1)","The document includes installation instructions, as well as examples of running the system. Screendumps are not provided. Fair presentation.(4)","The document includes installation instructions, as well as examples of running the system. Screendumps are provided but are not sufficient. Good presentation.(7)","The document includes installation instructions, \"how to get started\", and common usage scenarios. Examples of running the system are included. Screendumps are provided as necessary. Professional presentation.(10)"]
["Implementation (40%) - 17, 18, 21","The system fails in some critical features. The user interface allows the user to perform some common functions with ease, but others are harded to get to. Poor look and feel. (5)","The system performs as expected in most scenarios, but fails in some non-critical situations. The user interface allows the user to perform some common functions with ease, but others are harded to get to. Fair look and feel. (18)","The system performs as expected in all scenarios. The user interface allows the user to perform most common functions with ease. Adequate look and feel. (30)","The system performs as expected in all scenarios. The user interface allows the user to perform all common functions with ease. Professional look and feel. (40)"]