Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- resources [2013/10/16 21:42] – aboelaze
+++ resources [2013/11/11 17:18] (current) – aboelaze
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
   *   [[https://w2prod.sis.yorku.ca/Apps/WebObjects/cdm.woa/wa/curexam|York Exam Schedule]]
-===== Referene Papers =====
+===== Reference Papers =====
 These are some papers you can use for paper review. As I mentioned in the class it is done in groups of 2. Choose the paper and clear it with me first.
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
   * {{:cloud1.pdf|A framework for cloud embedded web services utilized by cloud applications}} Wahib et al ** Taken Jatin and Milandeep **
   * {{:cloud2.pdf|Cloudinsight: Shedding light on the cloud}} Arefin and Jiang ** TAKEN Varun and James**
-  * {{:faircloud_sigcomm.pdf|Faircloud: Sharing the network in cloud computing}} Popa et al.
+  * {{:faircloud_sigcomm.pdf|Faircloud: Sharing the network in cloud computing}} Popa et al. ** TAKEN Robert and Pathmaraj **
   * {{:europar02-02.pdf|Increasing instruction level parallelism with instruction precomputation}} Yi, Sendag and Lilja ** TAKEN Manjeet and Md Zahed **
   * {{:mips_r_10k.pdf|Mips R1000}} K. C. Eager
-  * {{:alpha21264.pdf|Alpha 21264 microprocessor}} R. E. Kessler
+  * {{:alpha21264.pdf|Alpha 21264 microprocessor}} R. E. Kessler ** TAKEN Aaron and Joseph**
   * {{:power5.pdf|IBM Power5 System Microarchitecture}} B. Sinharoy et al. ** TAKEN Raiyan and Manfred**
-  * {{:ieeeproc01.pdf|Microarchitectural Innovations: Boosting Microprocessor Performance Beyond Semiconductor technology Scaling}} A. Moshovos and G. Sohu
+  * {{:ieeeproc01.pdf|Microarchitectural Innovations: Boosting Microprocessor Performance Beyond Semiconductor technology Scaling}} A. Moshovos and G. Sohu ** TAKEN Mariam and Martin **
@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
+====== Paper Format ======
+The paper review is 4-8 pages 1.5 space font size 12.
+Your review should start with an introduction, what is the topic of the paper you are reviewing, and why is this topic important. This is usually taken from the paper you are reviewing, but not verbatim, use your own words.
+Then, previous work. here briefly review what was done in this topic and who did it. No need for a complete review, just 2-3 papers and a couple of sentences for each paper and how is that different from the main topic of the paper you are reviewing.
+The bulk of the work is explaining the paper you are reviewing. Usually the paper is written for a level that is higher than 4th year undergraduate students, so imagine that you are trying to explain this paper to a classmate. I will be looking for did you really understand the topic, or you are just paraphrasing the paper you are reviewing.
+Finally a small paragraph on what you see as future work and extension of the work in the paper
+For an article about how to write a system paper, chek "How to write a system paper" on my main web page.