course_outline
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
course_outline [2013/11/06 01:40] – created egz | course_outline [2014/03/20 22:35] (current) – egz | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | | + | ====== Course Outline ====== |
- | Project Selection | + | **Project Selection: |
- | Background Study: | + | When selecting |
- | Background Review: AT this stage, the students should be ready to present in class, a summary of the background study they ran on the chosen topic. The goal of this writing down this papers-review and presenting it, is to demonstrate the students comprehension of the underlying concepts and that allows them to improve the founding of their proposal. The main factors influencing the mark, dedicated to this part of project, are; first, the improvements achieved in the description of the right techniques involved in the project and second, the relevance of the team's answers to the audience' | ||
- | Design Specification: | ||
- | Critical Design Review (CDR) #1-2: In the first CDR, the students need to justify their approach by describing the main techniques and answering the questions. In the second CDR they will address the problems that were asked in the first CDR. The main factors affecting the mark dedicated to this part of project are; first, the quality of the description of design specifications with regard to the template and second, the relevance of the answers given to the questions. | ||
- | Implementation Set-up: Each team should provide a list of the main tools, equipment, consumable materials, electronic components and software. The list should be accompanied by a justification of each item needed. | ||
- | Critical Implementation Review (CIR) #1-8: Each group should submit a progress report and present their accomplishments in class. Convincing answers to the questions asked at the end of the presentation, | ||
- | Preliminary Demonstration | + | **Project Selection Review |
- | Final Demonstration and Reports: | + | The students |
+ | ** Background Study: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The students should run an engineering background search, prior to the beginning of the project. In this study, the team members should review all the techniques they may potentially use for the ends of their projects. Also the originality of the endeavor and similarities between the selected project and other works should be discussed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Background Review: | ||
+ | |||
+ | AT this stage, the students should be ready to present in class, a summary of the background study they ran on the chosen topic. The goal of this writing down this papers-review and presenting it, is to demonstrate the students comprehension of the underlying concepts and that allows them to improve the founding of their proposal. The main factors influencing the mark, dedicated to this part of project, are; first, the improvements achieved in the description of the right techniques involved in the project and second, the relevance of the team's answers to the audience' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Design Specification: | ||
+ | |||
+ | This a critical step, in project development, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Critical Design Review (CDR) #1-2:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the first CDR, the students need to justify their approach by describing the main techniques and answering the questions. In the second CDR they will address the problems that were asked in the first CDR. The main factors affecting the mark dedicated to this part of project are; first, the quality of the description of design specifications with regard to the template and second, the relevance of the answers given to the questions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Implementation Set-up: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Each team should provide a list of the main tools, equipment, consumable materials, electronic components and software. The list should be accompanied by a justification of each item needed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Critical Implementation Review (CIR) # | ||
+ | |||
+ | Each group should submit a progress report and present their accomplishments in class. Convincing answers to the questions asked at the end of the presentation, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Preliminary Demonstration | ||
+ | |||
+ | The students should demonstrate the first and second parts of project and answer the questions in PD #1 and PD #2 respectively. The main factors influencing the mark, dedicated to this phase of the project are; first, the successful demonstration of the results and second, answer to the questions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Final Demonstration and Reports: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The main goal of this project is to train the students to integrate various engineering techniques and through a problem solving and decision making processes, demonstrate the results of their project in a successful fashion. The final report is the main and final document that will be delivered from the students. This document should include all the studies, design and implementation procedures, results tables, images and graphics, formatted according to the template. | ||
- | Title % Delivery Date Final Modification | ||
- | 1 Project Selection 2.5 Sept. 18, 2003 Nov. 6, 2003 | ||
- | 2 Project Selection Review #1 0.5 Sept. 25 Oct. 9 | ||
- | 3 Project Selection Review #2 0.5 Oct. 16 Oct. 16 | ||
- | 4 Background Study 2.75 Oct. 9 Nov. 6 | ||
- | 5 Project Webpage 1.5 Oct. 18 April 30 | ||
- | 6 Background Review 1.75 Oct. 24 Oct. 25 | ||
- | 7 Design Specification 3.5 Nov. 6 Jan. 15 | ||
- | 8 Critical Design Review#1 1.75 Oct. 31 Nov. 1 | ||
- | 9 Critical Design Review#2 1.75 Nov. 7 Nov. 8 | ||
- | 10 Implementation Set-up 1.5 Nov. 6 Nov. 6 | ||
- | 11 Critical Implementation Review#1 1.75 Nov. 13 Nov. 20 | ||
- | 12 Critical Implementation Review#2 1.75 Nov. 27 Dec. 4 | ||
- | 13 Critical Implementation Review#3 1.75 Dec. 18 Dec. 25 | ||
- | 14 Preliminary Demonstration #1 4.0 Jan. 8, 2014 Jan. 15, 2004 | ||
- | 15 Critical Implementation Review#4 1.75 Jan. 22 Jan. 29 | ||
- | 16 Critical Implementation Review#5 1.75 Feb. 12 Feb 27 | ||
- | 17 Critical Implementation Review#6 1.75 Feb. 26 Feb 27 | ||
- | 18 Preliminary Demonstration #2 4.0 March 5 March 5 | ||
- | 19 Critical Implementation Review#7 1.75 March 12 March 19 | ||
- | 20 Critical Implementation Review#8 1.75 April 2 April 9 | ||
- | 21 Final Demonstration and Report#3 60 April 16 April 16 | ||
course_outline.1383702049.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/11/06 01:40 by egz