{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Sheet1"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":0,"defined_names":0,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Sheet1","index":0,"n_rows":6,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":6,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["Rubric for Player evaluation"]
["Grade","D","C","B","A"]
["Requirements Document (15%)","The document talks about the system, not the customer. Many features are missing. No acceptance test cases. Poor English / presentation.","The document mixes customer needs with system description. Several features are missing. No acceptance test cases. Fair presentation.","The document describes the needs of the customer. Some detail about the features is missing. Insufficient acceptance test cases. Good presentation.","The document describes the needs of the customer. All required features are described in detail. Acceptance test cases are provided. Professional presentation."]
["Testing Document (15%)","The document describes the test cases run. Discussion on why this should be sufficient testing is missing. Poor presentation.","The document describes the test cases run,  and the way they were implemented. Discussion on why this should be sufficient testing is missing. Fair presentation.","The document describes the test cases run, the way they were derived, and the way they were implemented. Discussion on why this should be sufficient testing is missing.  Good presentation. ","The document describes the test cases run, the way they were derived, and the way they were implemented. Discussion on why this should be sufficient testing is included. Professional presentation."]
["Player File Format (30%)","The format does not support key features of the system. Poor documentation of the format.","Some non-critical features are not supported by the file format. Poor documentation of the format.","Format supports all system features. Adequate presentation of the format.","Format supports all system features. Professional presentation of the format."]
["Implementation (40%)","The system fails to implement critical features. The code contains several code smells.","The system performs as expected in most scenarios, but fails in some non-critical situations. The code contains several code smells.","The system performs as expected in all scenarios. Code smells can be found in the code.","The system performs as expected in all scenarios. No code smells can be identified in the code."]