resources:p2:start
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
resources:p2:start [2014/01/13 17:29] – mourada | resources:p2:start [2014/01/15 18:43] – egz | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
Figure 1. (a) Effect of supperfluidity of water around spherical sperparamagnetic NPs.(b) fluid properties in absence of magnetic effects | Figure 1. (a) Effect of supperfluidity of water around spherical sperparamagnetic NPs.(b) fluid properties in absence of magnetic effects | ||
- | ====== Epilepsy ====== | + | |
+ | **Nanopore** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Set-up ( which nanoseconds membrane? size of hole? monitoring? , ? (background: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Epilepsy ====== | ||
MRI imaging of superparamagnetic particles and rods aggregates in the brain | MRI imaging of superparamagnetic particles and rods aggregates in the brain | ||
Line 118: | Line 125: | ||
• Evidence of an off-resonance effect of SPMNPs on proton resonance | • Evidence of an off-resonance effect of SPMNPs on proton resonance | ||
• translation of diffusion coefficients into surgical coordinates. | • translation of diffusion coefficients into surgical coordinates. | ||
- | • Correlation with histopathological findings and intended epilepsy triggering zones | + | • Correlation with histopathological findings and intended epilepsy triggering zones |
- | ====== Magnetophoresis & Simulation ====== | + | ** Micro-coil and usu=sage of MRI + Injection of nano-particles in rat/mouse** |
+ | |||
+ | ======III. | ||
Simulation of superparamagnetic nanomaterial interacting with epileptic seizure-like driven uT magnetic fields | Simulation of superparamagnetic nanomaterial interacting with epileptic seizure-like driven uT magnetic fields | ||
Line 158: | Line 167: | ||
References | References | ||
- | [2] A. Anguelouch, R. L. Leheny, and D. H. Reich, " | + | [2] A. Anguelouch, R. L. Leheny, and D. H. Reich, " |
+ | **Sandwich** | ||
+ | Literature? math? figures..... set-up? | ||
Line 208: | Line 219: | ||
Figure 1. Schematic of tumor detection unite | Figure 1. Schematic of tumor detection unite | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Magneto-accoustic effect for breast surgery ====== | ||
+ | II. Breast surgery | ||
+ | |||
+ | The therapeutic effect of focused ultrasound was known for quite a century now. Long ago, before MRI systems where made possible, there was absolutely no way to benefit from the therapeutic effect of focused | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2.1 MRI free focused ultrasound surgery breast carcinoma | ||
+ | A totally acoustic imaging and ablation system as mentioned formerly is quiet impossible. Unless, one resorts to contrast agents to highlight tumors under an acoustic field, tumors will remain invisible for contemporary sonographs. Ultrasound contrast agents consist mainly of gas entrapping, polymeric micro capsules that reflect ultrasonic waves in a different way that differs from tissues. But gas bubbles are highly soluble in blood, conferring to the capsules, a very shot period of life within the body and making them unsuitable for ablation applications. The development of a new technique of visualization and ablation of tumors using acoustic field exclusively is eminent and calls for a new generation of tumor markers for ultrasound imaging and new technique of focusing acoustic energy in homogeneous media, in a way that is independent of human observation and correction. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 2.2 All ultrasonic detection and ablation system | ||
+ | |||
+ | Heterogeneity of propagation media has been studied by the navy in order to overcome the problem of object identification by sonars, in troubled waters. Phase conjugation, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Figure. 2, All ultrasound detection and ablation of breast tumors | ||
+ | |||