resources:p2:start
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
resources:p2:start [2014/01/15 18:46] – egz | resources:p2:start [2024/03/06 17:01] (current) – removed egz | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Mourad Project ====== | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====== BBB ====== | ||
- | | ||
- | |||
- | I. Introduction | ||
- | |||
- | Our research group is formulating a manifold strategy, according to which, first, the SPMNMs aggregates will be given an aspect ratio (i.e. rods) to allow orientation of the sub micron rods, under the effect of a μT magnetic moment. This orienting effect requires the use of a simple homogeneous magnetic field (parallel field lines) with low intensity, the kind of magnetic fields used found in epileptic focus. Resorting to the use of magnetic moments instead of magnetic force (geometrical gradient) is more likely to match the scenario met when pyramidal cells are propagating seizure like electrical activity. | ||
- | |||
- | II. Motivation | ||
- | • Can any shape SPM NM reach the CNS without polymeric coating and under the effect of an external magnetic field. | ||
- | • Answering this question is laying out the way for delivery technologies using the MRI' | ||
- | • Could submicron rods be oriented in under the μT neuronal magnetic field | ||
- | • Magnetic moment driven aggregation of SPMNMs requires parallel field lines ( neither convergent nor divergent thus no specific region of the brain is concerned). | ||
- | • One new property is that nanorods exhibit is the fact that they are the most appropriate for use in presence of a magnetic field such as those present in an MRI system. | ||
- | • Experimental work will be run on rats inoculated with epileptic precursors and no symptomatic conditions like disrupted BBB or blood hypotension | ||
- | |||
- | III. Hypothesis | ||
- | |||
- | When seizures take place, μT magnetic moments are able to orient the nanorods. Whereas in the rest of the brain, the fluid shear forces dominate and electric currents due to normal brain activity produce transient magnetic field that have no noticeable effect on the aggregation coefficient of NPs nor on the orientation of the NRs. Part of this study is to quantize the aggregation coefficient at the epileptic focus using rotational (rods & moments) and translational (particles & gradients) forces. | ||
- | |||
- | 1) A static magnetic field applied on the scalp will allow delivery of SPMNM to CNS | ||
- | 2) The ratio of fluids shear forces on the SPM Poly/Met nanorod' | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | IV. Materials and methods | ||
- | |||
- | Given well characterized SPM nanoparticles and SPM Polmeric or Metalic nanorods suspension in water.(purchased materials). In order to mimic MRI contrast agents like Gd(III) a concentration of 5 mg/m has to be prepared by dilution. We will carry out the following experiments based on t size and dispersion. | ||
- | |||
- | 4.1 In vivo experiments on the delivery of SPMNMs to rats CNS in submerged in a MRI static magnetic field | ||
- | |||
- | The following experiment is conducted first using head mounted magnets. The delivery of particles to the brain due to magnetic influence on the BBB or the complex (BBB and Nps) will be elucidated. MRI will show hypointese regions in rat brains that account for successful delivery of the NPs. In the second series of experiments, | ||
- | Further studies are envisaged to explain the mechanism of retention of the NPs at the site of the focus. particles that will not deposit by the μT magnetic agglomeration will be cleared or biodegraded to join the naturally occurring brain iron in its fate. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | 4.2 Parameters | ||
- | • Intensity and location of static magnetic field of the permanent Niodim-Yag magnets | ||
- | • SPMNPs magnetic moment and size and crystal structure | ||
- | • Polymeric SPMNRs | ||
- | • Metalic SPMNRs asperct ratio, criystal structure and magnetic moment | ||
- | • number of injection times | ||
- | • number of epileptic seizes | ||
- | |||
- | **5. Magnetohydrodynamic effect** | ||
- | |||
- | MICRO MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Key words: water molecule, cyclic water molecule, superparamagnetic nanoparticles (SPMNPs), | ||
- | |||
- | Application: | ||
- | 1. Explaining why a static external magnetic field (from permanent magnet) will help SPMNs cross the Blood Brain Barrier (others use ultrasound to disrupt BBB, very dangerous) | ||
- | 2. No one has explained the internalization of SPMNPs by biological cells. In our case, SPMNPs should be internalized by cells because epileptic magnetic fields are produced by intracellular component of the electric field. The extra-cellular is of no use for trapping the SPMNs. | ||
- | Hypothesis | ||
- | |||
- | Water molecules bond to each other and form cyclic water under the effect of weak and time varying magnetic (or strong but not both) fields. Cyclic water exhibits super-fluidity, | ||
- | |||
- | Experimental setting | ||
- | In microfluidic chanels where SPMNPs are positioned permannatly, | ||
- | |||
- | | ||
- | |||
- | Figure 1. (a) Effect of supperfluidity of water around spherical sperparamagnetic NPs.(b) fluid properties in absence of magnetic effects | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | **Nanopore** | ||
- | |||
- | Set-up ( which nanoseconds membrane? size of hole? monitoring? , ? (background: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====== Epilepsy ====== | ||
- | |||
- | MRI imaging of superparamagnetic particles and rods aggregates in the brain | ||
- | Application to epileptic theragnostics | ||
- | |||
- | I. Introduction | ||
- | Detection of iron oxide nanoparticles agreggates in the brain is a routine procedure achieved successfully by Finlay et al. Strangely, Finlay used T1 relaxation time of the protons, whereas T2 is the most commonly used for MRI detection of SPM Iron Oxide in the RES system (liver, spleen, lymph nodes). T1 contrast agents are different from T2 contrast agents in a sense that T1 agents have a locale effect on protons (only the protons that get into close contact with the high spin density element of the contrast agent that experience T1 shortening). In this perspective, | ||
- | |||
- | II. Purpose | ||
- | • SPM nanoparticles are proven to cross the BBB and to have high deposition coefficient in brain tumors in-vivo. No evidence in the literature shows that Nanorods can cross the BBB and make its way to the neuronal tissues. | ||
- | • No non functionnalization nanomaterials where used in detection of epileptic foci based on interaction of seizure' | ||
- | • If we use polymeric nanorods instead of pure iron-oxide nanorods We will have a larger radius if the SPMIOs are confined to a volume of the polymer fibber. The T2 effect is remote and reaches far beyond the 50 µm boundary. And T1 sequences are aplicable due to infiltration of protons into the nao-polymeric-rod. | ||
- | • The larger the number of NMR signal sources is, the larger the amplitude of the signal is. | ||
- | • MRI sequence sensitive to water diffusion (diffusion imaging) is susceptible to create Diffusion coefficient maps of the brain. The presence of Nanorods aggregates will create anisotropic diffusion expressed in the diffusion tensor (image based). | ||
- | • Finally, | ||
- | |||
- | III. Hypothesis Epileptic foci Quantization of SPMIO 1) NPs, 2) Nps based fpolymeric rods and 3) SPMIO metallic rods deposits is feasible in the brain using T2 effect | ||
- | |||
- | IV. Materials and methods | ||
- | |||
- | Relaxation time (T2) will be quantified by nuclear magnetic resonance (RMN) for the proton in the presence of different concentration NPS NMs. This experiment will be ran in an identical magnetic field B0 to that developed by the MRI system at Sait-Luc Hospital (3 T). the NMR spectroscopic device is available at the Chemistry department of the University of Montreal. In order to achieve | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | 5.1 Preliminary experiments on the functional properties of the carriers | ||
- | |||
- | Proton NMR spectroscopy at 3 T | ||
- | • Without SPMNP (chemical shift, intensity signal ) | ||
- | • In presence of SPM NPs , Poly/Met nanorods( Off resonance effect, correlation sphere VS dose & size ) | ||
- | |||
- | 5.2 Spectroscopy and detection the resonance frequency of the SPM Nps, Poly/Met nanorods at 3T | ||
- | • Dose dependent frequency shift (effect of concentration and aggregate size) | ||
- | • sensitivity | ||
- | |||
- | 5.3 MRI of a physiologically relevant dose of SPM Nps, Poly/Met nanorods in a gel phantom | ||
- | |||
- | • Preparation of the gel (bovine collagen or agar gel) | ||
- | • Use of high aspect ratio of SPM rods and Pol/Met nanorods | ||
- | • Adjustment sequence parameters | ||
- | • Perform post-acquisition image analysis of diffusion weighted imaging | ||
- | |||
- | 5.4 Parameters | ||
- | SPMNPs concentration in aerosols, gel water content | ||
- | 5.6 Graphics expected | ||
- | • Spectra of protons and SPM NMs resonances at 3 T | ||
- | • Relaxivity of the SPM NMs on proton 1/T2 verses SPM NMs concentration | ||
- | • Images of SPM NMs aggregates | ||
- | • diffusion maps of the brain | ||
- | |||
- | 5.7 Expected results | ||
- | • Quantification of aggregates by MRI using T2 images of proton | ||
- | • Evidence of an off-resonance effect of SPMNPs on proton resonance | ||
- | • translation of diffusion coefficients into surgical coordinates. | ||
- | • Correlation with histopathological findings and intended epilepsy triggering zones | ||
- | |||
- | ** Micro-coil and usu=sage of MRI + Injection of nano-particles in rat/ | ||
- | |||
- | ======III. | ||
- | Simulation of superparamagnetic nanomaterial interacting with epileptic seizure-like driven uT magnetic fields | ||
- | |||
- | I. Introduction | ||
- | It is much more efficient to model the system before starting any in-vivo or in-vitro protocol. This will reduce the cost and help develop an efficient design tool, either for the imaging protols (size and morphology of the aggregates) or for the superparamagnetic materials to be used. Computer Simulation provides a means to virtually test the the interaction of the sad SPMNMs with neuronal bundles of different degrees of anisotropy (Fig. 1). It is Obvious that the isotropic configuration results in an overall magnetic | ||
- | field that is null, hence the impossibility of measuring it at a distance, like its the case in MEG. As a mater of fact, MEG detects magnetic fiels developed by highly anisotropic configurations inherent to temporal and hypocampal regions of the brain. The aggregation of superparamagnetic | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Figure 1. Tow different magnetic fields configurations | ||
- | II. Time independent analysis | ||
- | we will start with a modeling approach based on finite element modeling FEM to model SPMNMs absence of motion in presence of hydrodynamic forces and naturally occurring magnetic fields like the ones found in an epileptic seizure focus. An epileptic focus can be likened to a trap for the nanoparticles that eventually one has to asses its trapping efficiency. To do so, the neuronal network configurations will be considered independently from the particles and their motion. Using a static simulation that takes into account, magnetophoretic and hydrodinamic forces in their analytical forms, one can easily identify the spacial coordinates of regions where the forces add up to zero [1]. this simulaion work could be carried out on simulation platforms combining Matlab or ANSYS. | ||
- | |||
- | III. Time dependent analysis | ||
- | |||
- | Conventional simulation tools like ANSYS and COMSOL are not adapted to our application since they excel in modeling cases where applied fields are strong and thus, they consider their propagation unaffected by particles shapes and varying magnetic moments. In case of weak magnetic applied fields, the propagation of the magnetic field will be sparse and transient non uniform field are created within the particle itself, let alone at inter-sources distances. Consequently, | ||
- | IV. Theoretical considerations | ||
- | The paramagnetic particle (aspect ratio L/D) subjected to a magnetic field has a magnetic moment | ||
- | where is the magnetic volume of the particle. Projecting | ||
- | |||
- | If we replace the anisotropy of susceptibility of the rod by and if the magnetic field rotates (abruptly or at a pulsation | ||
- | |||
- | and a viscous torque | ||
- | |||
- | Where is the coefficient of hydrodynamic drag experienced by the rod and the instantaneous angular velocity of the rod, n, the viscosity of the fluid carrier, L the length and D the diameter of the nanoparticle respectively. | ||
- | References | ||
- | |||
- | [2] A. Anguelouch, R. L. Leheny, and D. H. Reich, " | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | **Sandwich** | ||
- | Literature? math? figures..... set-up? | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====== Interferometry ====== | ||
- | |||
- | Optical Characterization Of A Cantilever Array : Toward Integrated Wave Front Correctors And Analyzers For Miniaturized Adaptive Optics Systems | ||
- | |||
- | This paper presents the design, optimization and optical characterization of an array electrostatic actuators based MEMS to be used as an adaptive optics component of a portable retinal imaging device. The proposed wave-front corrector is implemented in (CMC) polymump technology and features an array of cantilevers on which planar reflective gold thin films were deposited for characterization purposes. | ||
- | |||
- | **Diagram and description of set-up** | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====== Brain surgery ====== | ||
- | |||
- | I. Brain surgery | ||
- | The scale of miniaturization achieved in microfabrication and the paralleled and unprecedented accomplishment in low cost and low energy CMOS IC fabrication technology, are not exploited to the fullest extent, and remain good candidates for the ultimate solution of online detection of cancer cells, with no need for cumbersome and inaccurate MRI systems. | ||
- | The ultimate goal of this research activity is to develop a miniaturized (Micro-device), | ||
- | The microfabricated magnetometer is to be mounted aboard the surgical tool used for excision. | ||
- | |||
- | 1.2 Atomic magnetometer | ||
- | Atomic magnetometry is more sensitive than SQUIDs (Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices made nowadays in micrometer size by micro fabrication of Josephson Junction). Based on electromagnetically induced transparency of alkali metal vapors, for example, potassium vapor (electron resonance EPR) placed in a magnetic field Bo (be it earth' | ||
- | 1.3 functionalization of nanoparticles | ||
- | Many polymeric compounds have been proven to cross the blood brain barrier (BBB) like PVA (polyvinyl Alcohol ) when synthesized at special molecular weights and Oilicon Oxide SiO2 to name a few. Except that when PVA or SiO2 are functionalized with Anti-bodies for tumor detection, the complex (SPMNP/ | ||
- | 1.4 Injection of SPMNPs | ||
- | Instead of using a topical application during surgery in order to tag cancerous cells and washing them out after photo-luminescent sensing, our research group suggests the investigation of the (BBB) preparation (heightened permeability). In the literature, BBB sonication has been applied on mice was proven efficient in allowing functionalized polymeric nanoparticles to reach the brain. Never has the technique been studied on human subjects. The other option is to inject the markers beyond the BBB. | ||
- | |||
- | | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Figure 1. Schematic of tumor detection unite | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ====== Magneto-accoustic effect for breast surgery ====== | ||
- | II. Breast surgery | ||
- | |||
- | The therapeutic effect of focused ultrasound was known for quite a century now. Long ago, before MRI systems where made possible, there was absolutely no way to benefit from the therapeutic effect of focused | ||
- | |||
- | 2.1 MRI free focused ultrasound surgery breast carcinoma | ||
- | A totally acoustic imaging and ablation system as mentioned formerly is quiet impossible. Unless, one resorts to contrast agents to highlight tumors under an acoustic field, tumors will remain invisible for contemporary sonographs. Ultrasound contrast agents consist mainly of gas entrapping, polymeric micro capsules that reflect ultrasonic waves in a different way that differs from tissues. But gas bubbles are highly soluble in blood, conferring to the capsules, a very shot period of life within the body and making them unsuitable for ablation applications. The development of a new technique of visualization and ablation of tumors using acoustic field exclusively is eminent and calls for a new generation of tumor markers for ultrasound imaging and new technique of focusing acoustic energy in homogeneous media, in a way that is independent of human observation and correction. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | 2.2 All ultrasonic detection and ablation system | ||
- | |||
- | Heterogeneity of propagation media has been studied by the navy in order to overcome the problem of object identification by sonars, in troubled waters. Phase conjugation, | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | {{: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Figure. 2, All ultrasound detection and ablation of breast tumors | ||
- | |||
resources/p2/start.1389811590.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/01/15 18:46 by egz