faq
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
faq [2007/09/18 14:30] – asif | faq [2007/09/18 14:33] (current) – asif | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
**Assignment 1:** | **Assignment 1:** | ||
- | Problem | + | |
+ | __Problem | ||
+ | Is this what you're looking for? | ||
Answer: This is one way of solving the summation. You can follow this approach. | Answer: This is one way of solving the summation. You can follow this approach. | ||
- | Problem | + | __Problem |
- | Analytically implies using the definition of the DTFT and solving the summation. | + | |
+ | Answer: | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Problem 8:__ You want us to take the DTFT of both x[k] and h[k] to obtain X(e^jw) and H(e^jw), multiply them together, then take the inverse DTFT? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Answer: Absolutely. | ||
- | Problem 8: You want us to take the DTFT of both x[k] and h[k] to obtain X(e^jw) and H(e^jw), multiply them together, then take the inverse | + | __Problem 10:__ You want us to take the z-transform |
- | Absolutely. | + | |
- | Problem 10: You want us to take the z-transform of both x[k] and h[k] to obtain X(z) and H(z), multiply them together, then take the inverse z-transform? | + | Answer: Absolutely. |
- | Absolutely. | + | |
---- | ---- | ||
faq.1190125818.txt.gz · Last modified: by asif